Personal website of Hylke Vandenbussche


 

1) Contact Information:

Professor International Economics,
Université Catholique de Louvain-la-Neuve,
Chaire Jacquemin,
Department of Economics and CORE
Place Montesquieu 3,
1348 Louvain-la-Neuve,
T: + 32 (0) 10 47 41 37
hylke.vandenbussche@uclouvain.be
 
 

 

 

 

Other Affiliations: Full Professor, Catholic University of Leuven, AFI & LICOS, Faculty of Economics, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium: 016 32 69 20; hylke.vandenbussche@econ.kuleuven.be

2) Copy of my cv in English: [pdf-file], in Dutch [pdf-file] and Bio-sketch: [pdf-file]

 

3) Work in Progress:

J. Konings and H. Vandenbussche (2009),"Antidumping Protection hurts Exporters. Firm-level Evidence from France", CEPR discussion paper n° 5678, London [pdf-file]

Abstract

This paper empirically evaluates the effects of antidumping measures on the exports of protected firms. While antidumping protection raises the domestic sales of the more “traditional” non-exporting firms on the protected market with about 5%, it negatively affects the firm-level exports of similar products as the protected ones. Export sales of protected firms fall by almost 8% compared to a relevant control group of unprotected firms. The drop in firm-level exports more than doubles for firms that are global, i.e. firms with foreign affiliates. Measured at the product-level, extra-EU exports of goods protected by antidumping fall by 36% while exports to target countries fall by as much as 66% following protection. Protection also affects the extensive margin of exporters but to a lesser extent. Initial exporters face a marginally higher probability to stop exporting during protection compared to unprotected firms. Finally, we find that the productivity of exporters falls while that of non-exporters rises during antidumping protection. We offer a number of plausible explanations for our findings arising from the heterogeneous firm literature. We also discuss the importance of our findings for policy.

 

H. Vandenbussche and M. Zanardi (2008),"The Global Chilling Effects of Antidumping Proliferation", CEPR discussion paper n° 5597, London. [pdf-file].

Abstract
Advocates of antidumping (AD) laws downplay their negative effects by arguing that the trade flows that are subject to AD are small and thus their distortions negligible. But while the adverse effect of AD on product level trade has long been established, the question remains whether there are trade effects at the aggregate level. The recent proliferation wave of AD laws provides us with a unique policy change to estimate the true trade effects of adopting and enforcing AD laws. For this purpose, we estimate the effect of AD on bilateral trade flows between the “new adopters” of AD laws and their trade partners. Using a gravity model of annual observations (1980-2000) our estimates show that AD has trade depressing effects on aggregate import volumes. We find that new tough users have their aggregate imports depressed by 15 billion US$ a year (or 6.6%) as a result of AD measures. For some developing countries like India and Taiwan, the dampening effects of AD laws on trade flows are found to substantially offset the gains from trade liberalization.

G. Mion, H. Vandenbussche and L. Zhu (2009),"Trade with China and Skill Upgrading in Manufacturing. Firm-level evidence", LICOS discussion paper n° 248, London. [pdf].

       We use Belgian Firm level data over the period 1996-2007 to analyze the impact of imports from China and other low wage countries on firm growth, exit and skill upgrading. Using firm-level imports we find Chinese imports to be more important than imports from other low wage countries. Import competition from China alone explains around 30% of total skull upgrading in Belgian manufacturing during this period. Our results also show that outsourcing to China increases relative employment of non-production workers and is beneficial to firm survival in Belgium.

 

S. Poncet, W. Steingress and H. Vandenbussche (2008), "Financial Constraints in China: firm-level Evidence", CEPR DP 5393, [pdf]

Abstract
This paper uses a unique micro-level data-set on Chinese firms to test for the existence of a "political-pecking order" in the allocation of credit. Our findings our threefold. Firstly, private Chinese firms are credit constrained while State-owned firms and foreign-owned firms in China are not; Secondly, the geographical and sectoral presence of foreign capital alleviates credit constraints faced by private Chinese firms. Thirdly, geographical and sectoral presence of state firms aggravates financial constraints for private Chinese firms. Therefore it seems that ongoing restructuring of the state-owned sector and further liberalization of foreign capital inflows in China can help to circumvent financial constraints and can boost the investment of private firms.

 

I. Van Beveren and H. Vandenbussche (2009),"Product and Process Innovation and the decision to Export", LICOS discussion paper 247, KUleuven [pdf-file]

We analyze the relationship between firm-level innovation and firms' propensity to start exporting for firms in a small open economy. We measure innovation by innovative effort (R&D) as well as by innovative output (product and process innovation). After carefully correcting for endogeneity and selection issues, the evidence points to firms self-selecting into innovation in anticipation of their entry into export market, rather than product and process innovation triggering entry into the export market. These results suggest that governments can foster firm-level innovation through trade liberalization.

 

K. Miyagiwa, H. Song and H. Vandenbussche (2009),"Innovation, Protection and Retaliation", [pdf-file].

Abstract
This paper develops a model where firms engage in process-improving R&D and countries differ in their enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPR). We aim to study firm-level innovation under unilateral and bilateral trade protection allowing for country heterogeneity in IPR enforcement. We offer a general theory on the link between trade policy and innovation. Our results are consistent with historical and other stylized facts and offer an explanation for the broad pattern of trade protection empirically observed.

 

J. Hartigan and H. Vandenbussche (2009),"The Proliferation of Trade Protection Laws: a theoretical explanation", [pdf-file]

Abstract
This paper develops a model that offers a plausible interpretation for the empirical observation of diffusion of antidumping (AD) laws amongst WTO members. Contrary to the regnant belief that this proliferation is driven mainly by retaliatory motives, our model shows that adoption and use of AD laws involve a cooperative act amongst WTO member in an infinite horizon model. The diffusion of AD laws need not result in a Prisoner's dilemma. Instead we show that the AD agreement of the WTO can serve as a risk-sharing vehicle amongst WTO members in response to adverse shocks incurred by domestic producers.

 

4) Publications:

  1. H. Vandenbussche and M. Zanardi (2009),"The Chilling Effects of Antidumping Proflieration", European Economic Review, second round.
  2. S. Poncet, W. Steingress and H. Vandenbussche (2009), "Financial Constraints in China: firm-level evidence", China Economic Review, second round.
  3. I. Van Beveren and H. Vandenbussche (2009),"Product and Process Innovation and the decision to Export", Journal of Economic Policy Reform, forthcoming.
  4. H. Vandenbussche and J. Wauters (2009), Motor Vehicles from China: dispute settlement case", World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
  5. J. Konings and H. Vandenbussche (2008),"Heterogenous Response of Firms to Trade Protection", [pdf-file], Journal of International Economics, 76, pp. 371-383. (updated version of CEPR discussion paper 4620)
  6. H. Vandenbussche and M. Zanardi (2008),"What Explains the Proliferation of Antidumping Laws?" [pdf-file], Economic Policy 23, January, pp. 98-103.
  7. J. Konings and H. Vandenbussche (2005),"Antidumping Protection and Markups of Domestic Firms: Evidence from firm level data", Journal of International Economics, 65, pp. 151-165 [pdf-file].
  8. H. Vandenbussche and Z. Zarnic (2008),"The Effects of US Safeguards on Steel on European Markups: firm-level evidence, Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 458-490, October. [pdf-file].
  9. H. Vandenbussche (2004),"Price-undertakings and Antidumping jumping FDI in the European Union", European Economic Review, 48, pp. 429-453. (together with R. Belderbos en R. Veugelers) [pdf-file]
  10. H. Vandenbussche, B. Janssen & K. Crabbe (2005) "Is there Regional Tax competition in Belgium?", De Economist, September 2005 153, pp. 257-276  [pdf-file]
  11. D. Collie and H Vandenbussche (2006),"Antidumping Duties and The Byrd Amendment", European Journal of Political Economy [pdf-file]
  12. H. Vandenbussche (2008), "Footloose Production", in R.S. Rajan & K.A. Reinert, Princeton Encyclopedia of World Economy, Princeton University Press. forthcoming [pdf].
  13. P. Montfort, H. Vandenbussche and E. Forlani (2008), "Skill-Upgrading in European Textiles resulting from Trade with China: Firm-level evidence", in Development and  International Economics: Essays in Memory of  Michel Norro (ed.): André Nyembwe, Presse Universitaire de Louvain 2008. [pdf-file]
  14. H. Vandenbussche (2007),"Discussion of the Upland Cotton Dispute settlement Case", published by American Law Institute and edited by H. Horn and P. Mavroidis.
  15. D. Collie & H. Vandenbussche (2005),"Can Import Tariff Deter Outward FDI?", Open Economies Review, 16, pp. 341-362.[full text]

  16. J. Konings & H. Vandenbussche (2004),"Financial Ratio Adjustment in the presence of Soft Budget Constraints: Evidence from Bulgaria", European Accounting Review. [full text], May, vol 13 (1), pp. 131-159.
  17. H. Vandenbussche (2002),"Two decades of EU Antidumping policy against China: an outlook with China’s WTO membership", Journal of World Trade, (together with Liu Xiang), [full text]
  18. J.Konings, M. Rizov and H. Vandenbussche (2003),"Investment Constraints in Transition Countries", Economics Letters, 18, pp. 253-258. [full text].
  19. J. Konings, H. Vandenbussche and L. Springael (2001),"Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy", Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 1:3, 283-299 . [abstract] [full text]
  20. W. Pauwels, H. Vandenbussche and M. Weverbergh (2001),"Strategic Behaviour under European Antidumping Duties", International Journal of the Economics of Business, vol.8, n°1,pp. 75-99, [abstract] [full text]
  21. H.Vandenbussche, R. Veugelers and J. Konings (2001),"Union Wage Bargaining and European Antidumping Policy", Oxford Economic Papers-new series, 53, pp.297-317. [abstract] [full text]
  22. H. Vandenbussche and X. Wauthy (2000),"Price-Undertakings and Firms'strategic choice of Quality", European Journal of Political Economy, vol.17, pp.101-116. [abstract] [full text]
  23. H. Vandenbussche (2000),"Trade Policy versus Competition Policy: complements or substitutes", De Economist-Netherlands, 148, n°5, pp.625-642 . [abstract] [full text]
  24. E. Faucompret, J. Konings & H. Vandenbussche (1999),"The integration of Central and Eastern Europe in the EU: trade and Labour market adjustment", Journal of World Trade, vol. 33,n° 6, pp.121-145. [abstract] [full text]
  25. R. Veugelers and H. Vandenbussche (1999), "European Antidumping Policy and the profitability of national and international collusion", European Economic Review, No. 43/1, pp. 1-28. [abstract] [full text]
  26. H.Vandenbussche (1996), "Is European antidumping protection against Central Europe too high?', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/ Review of World Economics, March, vol.132, pp. 116-138.1. [abstract] [full text]
  27. J.Konings & H.Vandenbussche (1995), "The effects of foreign competition on U.K. wages and employment: evidence from panel data", Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics, December, vol.131, pp.655-672. [full text]
  28. H.Vandenbussche (1995), "How can Japanese and Central-European exporters to the EU, avoid Antidumping duties?", World Competition. Law and Economics Review, March, Geneva, pp. 55-74. [full text]
  29. H. Vandenbussche and J. Konings (1998), 'Globalization and the effects of national versus international competition on the labour market', World Economy, November. [abstract] [full text]
  30. H. Vandenbussche (2002), "Can Training and employment subsidies combat European Unemployment?",discussion of paper by J. Kluve and C. Schmidt, Economic Policy, October.
  31. H. Vandenbussche (2002),"Regional unemployment clusters" discussion of paper by D. Puga and H. Overrman, Economic Policy, April, vol. 34, pp. 144-145
  32. H. Vandenbussche, B. Janssens & K. Crabbé, (2005),"Regional Tax Competition. Firm level evidence for Belgium", De Economist, September 153(3), pp.257-276, [full text].
  33. D. Collie & H. Vandenbussche (2005),"Can Import Tariffs Deter Outward FDI?", Open Economies Review, 16, pp. 341-362.[full text]

  34. D. Collie & H. Vandenbussche (2006),"Tariffs and the Byrd Amendment", European Journal of Political Economy, in press.[full text].

 

5) Working papers:

6) Publications in national journals:

7) Other Publications:

  • H. Vandenbussche and H. Vandenbussche (2008),”Antidumping in the EU: the time of missed opportunities”, February, Vox-article (http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/917)

  • H. Vandenbussche (2008), “Antidumping: Good for Bad firms, Bad for Good firms”, September (http://www.voxeu.org).

  • H. Vandenbussche (2009), "Antidumping: Good for Bad Firms, Bad for Good Firms, June, European Commission, BEPA monthly n°27, p23.

8) Data on EU Antidumping cases:

Recently a very comprehensive data set was put together by Chad Bown from Brandeis with the help of the World Bank.. This Global Antidumping Database can be accessed via this link http://www.brandeis.edu/~cbown/global_ad/. At present it is the best publicly available dataset that academic researchers can use to study the use of Antidumping for many countries around the world.

9) Interesting Links:

10) Research Group on Corporate Taxation:

Since 2003 the Research Council of the Catholic University of Leuven has approved a research grant to stimulate economic research in the area of Corporate Tax Competition in Europe with a special focus on Belgium. To learn more on the research group click here.

11) Policy Reports :

  1. H. Vandenbussche, 2006, "Fiscalité des entreprises et création d'emplois: nouveaux éléments d'évaluation pour la Belgique et ses régions?", Regards Economiques, 41 (1),  [pdf-file]
  2. H. Vandenbussche,(2005),"Vennootschapsbelasting in Europees Perspectief" [pdf-file] (uitgegeven bij VKW metena)
  3. J. Konings en H. Vandenbussche, (2006),"De impact van de vennootschapsbelasting op de tewerkstelling en groei in België", (pdf-file), uitgegeven bij VKW metena).
  4. announcement of lunch debate:"Chinese textiles-Undressing the Issues" [pdf-file]
  5. presentation slides "Chinese Textiles-Addressing the Issues" [powerpoint document] by H. Vandenbussche

Personal:

Some Pictures of my kids

Femke in kitchen when she was 4 !
Femke in garden!

Witse playing with dolls when he was 3 !
Witse by the pool!

Femke and Witse in the tub!
Femke and Witse in pool!
Femke and Witse with dog!


Personal webpage
Inhoud en realisatie: Hylke Vandenbussche
Laatste wijziging: 01 feb 2006
URL: