
[back]
Short policy-relevant contributions –
Korte beleidsrelevante bijdragen
(in reverse chronological order)
[1] Nederlandstalige bijdragen [go to]
[2] Posts on www.voxeu.org [go to]
[3] Policy reports commissioned by
governments [go to]
[4] Policy presentations [go to]
[5] Other [go to]
[1] Beleidsrelevante bijdragen
·
Overheidsinterventies in de auto
industrie. Te veel actie en te weinig strategie,
·
Verschenen
als: Zonder
staalharde strategie geen belastinggeld voor automobiel, De Morgen, 1
augustus 2009
Nu de saga van het
faillissement van General Motors, de uitverkoop van Opel, en de waarschijnlijke
sluiting van Opel Antwerpen stilaan naar zijn eindpunt loopt is, loont het de
moeite om te kijken welke lessen we kunnen trekken uit de vele
overheidsinterventies in de auto sector.
·
Voer voor een revolte, interview in De Standaard, 1 augustus 2009
Heeft het zin dat een
overheid ‘haar’ automobielindustrie bijspringt met miljarden staatssteun? Of is
dat weggegooid geld dat in een diepe put verdwijnt?
·
Kris Peeters is niet gek, De Standaard, 29 juli 2009
Doet
Vlaanderen gekke dingen door Volvo Gent te steunen? Niet als je vergelijkt met
wat er in het buitenland allemaal gebeurt om noodlijdende autofabrieken
kunstmatig in leven te houden.
·
Welk beleid voor de (Vlaamse) auto-industrie, CES - Leuvens Economisch Standpunt #126,
Juni 2009
Uitgebreidere schets van de
problemen in de (globale) auto industrie, problemen met de interventies, en een
aantal beleidsaanbevelingen toegespitst op de Vlaamse industrie.
·
Wat met Opel Antwerpen?, De Standaard, 16 april 2009
Heeft
Vlaanderen al nagedacht over de autosector? Er zijn talloze redenen waarom een
Vlaamse kapitaalinbreng in een onafhankelijk Opel Europa weinig zin heeft.
Vlaanderen zou zich beter eerst afvragen waar het met de autoassemblage naartoe
wil, voor het nog eens de portemonnee opentrekt in een ondoordachte
reddingsoperatie op het laatste moment.
·
De overheid kan Opel niet redden, De Morgen, 18 februari 2009
De
beslissing om Opel Antwerpen te sluiten is in zekere zin al genomen in 2006
toen de productie van de nieuwe Astra aan andere GM Europa vestigingen is
toevertrouwd. Hoe kan het toch dat er toen geen haan naar kraaide, maar dat nu
de overheid wel met belastingssteun klaar staat als de situatie er alleen maar
beroerder voor staat.
[top]
[2] Posted on Voxeu.org [My Profile on Vox: Johannes Van Biesebroeck]
·
Canadian
auto subsidies: Money for nothing? [post] February 10, 2009
Following the US bailout
of the automotive industry, Canada is now bailing out its own auto firms, lest
they risk southward migration. However, this column shows that this most recent
action only continues a long history of lavish subsidies for the auto industry.
Are governments giving away money for nothing?
(Full
paper is forthcoming as “Bidding for Investment Projects: smart public policy
or corporate welfare” in Canadian Public Policy) (paper)
·
How to help the
auto sector: Looking beyond bailouts [post] February 4, 2009
This column proposes
ending six policies that hamper the US automotive industry. It suggests
replacing discretionary environmental policies with a CO2 tax, addressing
legacy costs, ending the distinction between right-to-work and other states,
levelling the investment subsidy playing field, resolving uncertainty
surrounding the future powertrain, and allowing direct sales to the public.
·
Helping
Africa export [post] with Garth Frazer, August
7, 2007
Recent research shows
that the much-discussed African problems – poor infrastructure, poor public
services, etc. – did not stop Africa from boosting its exports when the US
lowered it tariffs and limited other subtle trade barriers. Other OECD
countries should re-consider their trade policies towards Africa in this light.
Full paper is forthcoming
as “Trade Growth Following the African Growth and Opportunity Act” in the
Review of Economics and Statistics)(paper)
[top]
[3] Policy reports commissioned by the Canadian (or other) government
·
Prospects
for Canada in the NAFTA Automotive Industry: A Global Value Chain Analysis [paper] with Gary Gereffi and Tim
Sturgeon, March 2007, published online by Industry Canada.
Our
work on global value chains(in truth, mostly my co-authors’ work) has sparked
great interest in the subject by several Canadian government departments and a
conference was devoted to the GVC framework in Ottawa in September 2007 that
featured our work.(program)
·
The Canadian
Automotive Market [Abstract]
[Executive
summary] February
2006
Report
to the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade on the
likely impact of a Canada – South Korea FTA on the Canadian automotive market,
both in terms of FDI, finished vehicles, and automotive components.
The
full report has been published by DFAIT in 2006 edition of the volume “Trade
Policy Research” (Paper)
·
Impediments
and Facilitators of Technology Adoption and Diffusion. A Literature Survey of
the Last 10 Years [paper], September 2006, prepared
for Industry
·
Performance
and Regulatory Patterns in the OECD Countries, Working Party 1 report, OECD
[top]
[4] Policy presentations
·
Global Value
Chains in the Automotive Industry [presentation]
March 2009
Invited
presentation at a conference by CRIMT (Centre de Recherche Interuniversitaire
sur la Mondialisation et le Travail) in Montreal on the future of manufacturing
in North America
·
Outsourcing
Multiple Parts: An Application to the Automotive Industry [presentation]
with Lijun Zhang,
October 2006
·
Capability
Building in China’s Auto Supply Chain [presentation]
with Loren
Brandt, October 2006
Two
presentations to a conference on “Offshore Outsourcing: Capitalizing on Lessons
Learned”, jointly organized by the Rotman School of Management (University of
Toronto) and Industry Canada
·
Outsourcing
and Offshoring of Automotive Components [presentation]
March 2005
Presentation
delivered at the Global Supply Chain Roundtable (Ottawa). This was an
industry-government roundtable organized by Industry Canada to discuss the role
of Canadian firms in global value chains.
[top]
[5] Other
·
The next
frontier in public policy: Bidding for Beckham [presentation]
[ISCR
newsletter]
A
discussion of the remarkable New Zealand policy switch to abandon a program
that gave money to foreign companies to invest in New Zealand to a program
giving money to New Zealand firms to invest overseas. The former is an FDI
attraction program that most countries operate and that has doubtful value. The
latter is a novel insight that in order to play in global production networks
firms need to be where the action is, and no government programs are there to
help them out with these upfront investment costs.
(Full
paper is published as “Governments at the bidding table” in New Zealand
Economic Papers) (paper)
[top]
