ABSTRACT
Laurens Cherchye and Wim Moesen, Institutional Infrastructure and
Economic Performance: Levels versus Catching Up and Frontier Shifts, Download paper
We analyze the relationship between institutional infrastructure (capturing
political stability, quality of government and social infrastructure) and
overall country productivity for a sample of 57 (OECD and non-OECD) countries.
Specifically, we compare empirical results for alternative productivity
measures: output per worker and total factor productivity (TFP); in addition,
we consider both levels and changes, where we decompose TFP changes into
efficiency changes and technical changes. This gives us insight into the
different channels through which the institutional infrastructure impacts on
overall productivity performance: the 'accumulation' of production factors
versus the 'accommodation' of production factors, and the 'shifting' of the
world productivity frontier versus the 'catching up' with this frontier. In
line with the existing literature, our results suggest a substantial
accumulation effect: good institutions enhance capital accumulation. In
addition, we find significant evidence in favor of an accommodation effect (in
terms of both levels and changes), which elicits institutional quality as a
'lubricant' of the economic system: good institutions facilitate complex
transactions, specialization and flexibility while reducing transaction costs.
Interestingly, we find that good institutions enhance technical change as well
as efficiency change.
Conveniently, the decomposition of TFP change also allows us to interpret the
convergence issue, for which largely inconclusive evidence is obtained on the
basis of a combined TFP measure. Our findings reveal that efficiency change is
associated with convergence, i.e., countries with lower initial productivity
realize higher productivity growth through catching up. By contrast, technical
change corresponds to divergence, i.e., countries with higher initial
productivity succeed in higher productivity growth through shifts of the
technological frontier. One possible rationalization is that greater experience
with technological innovation (i.e., a closer situation to the world technology
frontier) benefits the implementation of new products and processes (i.e., the
cost of additional innovations falls).